5e585b92b422e345…

Preprint
ID: 5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d2,707 bytesFirst seen Jun 24, 20261 collection

Fields

NameValue
abstractThe discipline of political science has been engaged in discussion about when, why, and how to make scholarship more transparent for at least three decades. This piece argues that qualitative researchers can achieve transparency in diverse ways, using techniques and strategies that allow them to balance and optimize among competing considerations that affect the pursuit of transparency.. We begin by considering the “state of the debate,” briefly outlining the contours of the scholarship on transparency in political and other social sciences, which so far has focussed mostly on questions of “whether” and “what” to share. We investigate competing considerations that researchers have to consider when working towards transparent research. The heart of the piece considers various strategies, illustrated by exemplary applications, for making qualitative research more transparent.
abstractViews7464
approvedDate2019-10-02T17:41:41.959Z
assetFileNameTransparency-in-Practice_Preprint.pdf
assetFileSizeBytes258428
assetMimeTypeapplication/pdf
assetUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d/original/transparency-in-practice-in-qualitative-research.pdf
authorIds["name:diana kapiszewski","orcid:0000-0001-8249-7388"]
categoryIds["5ce663395846762193c9c425"]
citations1
commentsCount0
communityIdAPSA
competingInterestsDeclarationnull
contentDownloads1999
contentTypeWorking Paper
contentTypeId5ce663395846762193c9c430
doi10.33774/apsa-2019-if2he-v2
doiUrlhttps://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-if2he-v2
engageUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d
eventIdnull
funders[{"funderId":"10.13039/100000001","grantNumber":"SES 1628636","name":"National Science Foundation","url":null}]
gainedEthicsApprovalnull
hasCompetingInterestsnull
isLatestVersiontrue
keywords["research transparency","qualitative data","open science"]
licenseId5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef23
publishedDate2019-10-02T17:41:42.009Z
statusPUBLISHED
statusDate2019-10-02T17:41:42.009Z
subjectId5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752
submittedDate2019-10-02T16:51:34.066Z
supplementaryFiles[]
thumbnailUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d/mediumThumb/transparency-in-practice-in-qualitative-research.jpg
titleTransparency in Practice in Qualitative Research
version2
vor{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955","vorDoi":"10.1017/S1049096520000955"}
webLinks[]

Canonical JSON

{
  "id": "5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d",
  "type": "Preprint",
  "data": {
    "abstract": "The discipline of political science has been engaged in discussion about when, why, and how to make scholarship more transparent for at least three decades. This piece argues that qualitative researchers can achieve transparency in diverse ways, using techniques and strategies that allow them to balance and optimize among competing considerations that affect the pursuit of transparency.. We begin by considering the “state of the debate,” briefly outlining the contours of the scholarship on transparency in political and other social sciences, which so far has focussed mostly on questions of “whether” and “what” to share. We investigate competing considerations that researchers have to consider when working towards transparent research. The heart of the piece considers various strategies, illustrated by exemplary applications, for making qualitative research more transparent.",
    "abstractViews": 7464,
    "approvedDate": "2019-10-02T17:41:41.959Z",
    "assetFileName": "Transparency-in-Practice_Preprint.pdf",
    "assetFileSizeBytes": 258428,
    "assetMimeType": "application/pdf",
    "assetUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d/original/transparency-in-practice-in-qualitative-research.pdf",
    "authorIds": [
      "name:diana kapiszewski",
      "orcid:0000-0001-8249-7388"
    ],
    "categoryIds": [
      "5ce663395846762193c9c425"
    ],
    "citations": 1,
    "commentsCount": 0,
    "communityId": "APSA",
    "competingInterestsDeclaration": null,
    "contentDownloads": 1999,
    "contentType": "Working Paper",
    "contentTypeId": "5ce663395846762193c9c430",
    "doi": "10.33774/apsa-2019-if2he-v2",
    "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-if2he-v2",
    "engageUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d",
    "eventId": null,
    "funders": [
      {
        "funderId": "10.13039/100000001",
        "grantNumber": "SES 1628636",
        "name": "National Science Foundation",
        "url": null
      }
    ],
    "gainedEthicsApproval": null,
    "hasCompetingInterests": null,
    "isLatestVersion": true,
    "keywords": [
      "research transparency",
      "qualitative data",
      "open science"
    ],
    "licenseId": "5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef23",
    "publishedDate": "2019-10-02T17:41:42.009Z",
    "status": "PUBLISHED",
    "statusDate": "2019-10-02T17:41:42.009Z",
    "subjectId": "5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752",
    "submittedDate": "2019-10-02T16:51:34.066Z",
    "supplementaryFiles": [],
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d94c7762f41c7001256af6d/mediumThumb/transparency-in-practice-in-qualitative-research.jpg",
    "title": "Transparency in Practice in Qualitative Research",
    "version": "2",
    "vor": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520000955",
      "vorDoi": "10.1017/S1049096520000955"
    },
    "webLinks": []
  }
}

Appears in 1 collection

cambridge-up/open-engage1 version · Jun 24, 2026

Full hash:5e585b92b422e3453f75c34630345ebb7df290e72f50b06af0c485439bbe6692