60d13de20fe44830…

Preprint
ID: 5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c2,608 bytesFirst seen Jun 24, 20261 collection

Fields

NameValue
abstractIt is common to ask whether populism is a threat or a corrective to democracy. In the empirical literature, the conclusion tends to be that it is both. Mouffe’s normative account promotes populism because of its alleged ability to deepen democracy. Both literatures are inhibited by an observer perspective, which evaluates populism as a phenomenon that affects democracy from the outside rather than as an alternative conception of democracy. This paper proposes an alternative approach, which uses the publicity condition of Kant and Rawls. The publicity condition entails taking a participant perspective, where you regard yourself as involved with plural others in a common enterprise of deliberation. While the observer considers the causes and effects of different doctrines in order to explain, manipulate and/or exploit political practice, the participant asks whether we could make a doctrine our own, something we would promote and use to assess the health of democracy.
abstractViews1012
approvedDate2019-09-20T12:56:18.073Z
assetFileNameRostboll - Populism and Publicity - APSA2019.pdf
assetFileSizeBytes425852
assetMimeTypeapplication/pdf
assetUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c/original/populism-and-publicity-the-participant-perspective.pdf
authorIds["orcid:0000-0002-9887-0092"]
categoryIds["5ce663395846762193c9c426"]
citations1
commentsCount0
communityIdAPSA
competingInterestsDeclarationnull
contentDownloads309
contentTypeWorking Paper
contentTypeId5ce663395846762193c9c430
doi10.33774/apsa-2019-hdx7q
doiUrlhttps://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-hdx7q
engageUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c
eventIdnull
funders[]
gainedEthicsApprovalnull
hasCompetingInterestsnull
isLatestVersiontrue
keywords["Democracy","Populism","Participant perspective","Rawls","Kant","Mouffe","Laclau"]
licenseId5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27
publishedDate2019-09-20T12:56:18.084Z
statusPUBLISHED
statusDate2019-09-20T12:56:18.084Z
subjectId5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752
submittedDate2019-09-19T20:06:00.071Z
supplementaryFiles[]
thumbnailUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c/mediumThumb/populism-and-publicity-the-participant-perspective.jpg
titlePOPULISM AND PUBLICITY: THE PARTICIPANT PERSPECTIVE
version1
vornull
webLinks[]

Canonical JSON

{
  "id": "5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c",
  "type": "Preprint",
  "data": {
    "abstract": "It is common to ask whether populism is a threat or a corrective to democracy. In the empirical literature, the conclusion tends to be that it is both. Mouffe’s normative account promotes populism because of its alleged ability to deepen democracy. Both literatures are inhibited by an observer perspective, which evaluates populism as a phenomenon that affects democracy from the outside rather than as an alternative conception of democracy. This paper proposes an alternative approach, which uses the publicity condition of Kant and Rawls. The publicity condition entails taking a participant perspective, where you regard yourself as involved with plural others in a common enterprise of deliberation. While the observer considers the causes and effects of different doctrines in order to explain, manipulate and/or exploit political practice, the participant asks whether we could make a doctrine our own, something we would promote and use to assess the health of democracy.",
    "abstractViews": 1012,
    "approvedDate": "2019-09-20T12:56:18.073Z",
    "assetFileName": "Rostboll - Populism and Publicity - APSA2019.pdf",
    "assetFileSizeBytes": 425852,
    "assetMimeType": "application/pdf",
    "assetUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c/original/populism-and-publicity-the-participant-perspective.pdf",
    "authorIds": [
      "orcid:0000-0002-9887-0092"
    ],
    "categoryIds": [
      "5ce663395846762193c9c426"
    ],
    "citations": 1,
    "commentsCount": 0,
    "communityId": "APSA",
    "competingInterestsDeclaration": null,
    "contentDownloads": 309,
    "contentType": "Working Paper",
    "contentTypeId": "5ce663395846762193c9c430",
    "doi": "10.33774/apsa-2019-hdx7q",
    "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-hdx7q",
    "engageUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c",
    "eventId": null,
    "funders": [],
    "gainedEthicsApproval": null,
    "hasCompetingInterests": null,
    "isLatestVersion": true,
    "keywords": [
      "Democracy",
      "Populism",
      "Participant perspective",
      "Rawls",
      "Kant",
      "Mouffe",
      "Laclau"
    ],
    "licenseId": "5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27",
    "publishedDate": "2019-09-20T12:56:18.084Z",
    "status": "PUBLISHED",
    "statusDate": "2019-09-20T12:56:18.084Z",
    "subjectId": "5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752",
    "submittedDate": "2019-09-19T20:06:00.071Z",
    "supplementaryFiles": [],
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d83dc522f41c7001256af4c/mediumThumb/populism-and-publicity-the-participant-perspective.jpg",
    "title": "POPULISM AND PUBLICITY: THE PARTICIPANT PERSPECTIVE",
    "version": "1",
    "vor": null,
    "webLinks": []
  }
}

Appears in 1 collection

cambridge-up/open-engage1 version · Jun 24, 2026

Full hash:60d13de20fe44830390bfe8e01bd49a8efad7533bc032c45b21a1889a2da0162