84e40772ac96d2c6…
PreprintID:
5e15f685afc3ff001967352f2,694 bytesFirst seen Jun 24, 20261 collectionFields
| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| abstract | While political theory occasionally resembles a protracted discussion about violence, the same cannot be said for atrocity. Where something recognizable as atrocity does crop up in canonical texts, it tends to be characterized as a fundamentally extra-political phenomenon. The canon promotes a tautology: atrocity is extra-political and properly political violence is not atrocious. To begin my discussion of atrocity, I first consider the figure of the tyrant and tyrannical violence in Western political thought as a possible proxy issue for early thinking about transgressive violence. Of the many disquisitions on tyranny, Seneca’s distinction between ordinary cruelty and what he calls “bestial savagery” establishes the basis for a theory of atrocity, but it does not go far enough. I then survey canonical discussions of transgressive violence up to the present, emphasizing the recurring theme of non-instrumentality. Finally, I present a tentative formulation of atrocity that underscores its political nature. |
| abstractViews | 868 |
| approvedDate | 2020-01-08T19:31:53.245Z |
| assetFileName | The Bull of Phalaris - Reduced.pdf |
| assetFileSizeBytes | 235595 |
| assetMimeType | application/pdf |
| assetUrl | https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f/original/the-bull-of-phalaris-atrocity-in-the-canon.pdf |
| authorIds | ["orcid:0000-0001-5080-5112"] |
| categoryIds | ["5ce663395846762193c9c426"] |
| citations | 0 |
| commentsCount | 0 |
| communityId | APSA |
| competingInterestsDeclaration | null |
| contentDownloads | 982 |
| contentType | Working Paper |
| contentTypeId | 5ce663395846762193c9c430 |
| doi | 10.33774/apsa-2020-xkvxd |
| doiUrl | https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-xkvxd |
| engageUrl | https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f |
| eventId | null |
| funders | [] |
| gainedEthicsApproval | null |
| hasCompetingInterests | null |
| isLatestVersion | true |
| keywords | ["Atrocity","Violence","Genocide","Cruelty","Phalaris","Torture","Sadism","Evil","Seneca","Aristotle","More","Montaigne","Political Theory","Trangressive Violence"] |
| licenseId | 5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27 |
| publishedDate | 2020-01-08T19:31:53.257Z |
| status | PUBLISHED |
| statusDate | 2020-01-08T19:31:53.257Z |
| subjectId | 5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752 |
| submittedDate | 2020-01-08T15:55:44.479Z |
| supplementaryFiles | [] |
| thumbnailUrl | https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f/mediumThumb/the-bull-of-phalaris-atrocity-in-the-canon.jpg |
| title | The Bull of Phalaris: Atrocity in the Canon |
| version | 1 |
| vor | null |
| webLinks | [] |
Canonical JSON
{
"id": "5e15f685afc3ff001967352f",
"type": "Preprint",
"data": {
"abstract": "While political theory occasionally resembles a protracted discussion about violence, the same cannot be said for atrocity. Where something recognizable as atrocity does crop up in canonical texts, it tends to be characterized as a fundamentally extra-political phenomenon. The canon promotes a tautology: atrocity is extra-political and properly political violence is not atrocious. To begin my discussion of atrocity, I first consider the figure of the tyrant and tyrannical violence in Western political thought as a possible proxy issue for early thinking about transgressive violence. Of the many disquisitions on tyranny, Seneca’s distinction between ordinary cruelty and what he calls “bestial savagery” establishes the basis for a theory of atrocity, but it does not go far enough. I then survey canonical discussions of transgressive violence up to the present, emphasizing the recurring theme of non-instrumentality. Finally, I present a tentative formulation of atrocity that underscores its political nature.",
"abstractViews": 868,
"approvedDate": "2020-01-08T19:31:53.245Z",
"assetFileName": "The Bull of Phalaris - Reduced.pdf",
"assetFileSizeBytes": 235595,
"assetMimeType": "application/pdf",
"assetUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f/original/the-bull-of-phalaris-atrocity-in-the-canon.pdf",
"authorIds": [
"orcid:0000-0001-5080-5112"
],
"categoryIds": [
"5ce663395846762193c9c426"
],
"citations": 0,
"commentsCount": 0,
"communityId": "APSA",
"competingInterestsDeclaration": null,
"contentDownloads": 982,
"contentType": "Working Paper",
"contentTypeId": "5ce663395846762193c9c430",
"doi": "10.33774/apsa-2020-xkvxd",
"doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2020-xkvxd",
"engageUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f",
"eventId": null,
"funders": [],
"gainedEthicsApproval": null,
"hasCompetingInterests": null,
"isLatestVersion": true,
"keywords": [
"Atrocity",
"Violence",
"Genocide",
"Cruelty",
"Phalaris",
"Torture",
"Sadism",
"Evil",
"Seneca",
"Aristotle",
"More",
"Montaigne",
"Political Theory",
"Trangressive Violence"
],
"licenseId": "5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27",
"publishedDate": "2020-01-08T19:31:53.257Z",
"status": "PUBLISHED",
"statusDate": "2020-01-08T19:31:53.257Z",
"subjectId": "5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752",
"submittedDate": "2020-01-08T15:55:44.479Z",
"supplementaryFiles": [],
"thumbnailUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5e15f685afc3ff001967352f/mediumThumb/the-bull-of-phalaris-atrocity-in-the-canon.jpg",
"title": "The Bull of Phalaris: Atrocity in the Canon",
"version": "1",
"vor": null,
"webLinks": []
}
}Appears in 1 collection
cambridge-up/open-engage1 version · Jun 24, 2026
Full hash:84e40772ac96d2c6ba2382e33818fd2c57d28c9afdf2bf8e6aa6db9773b4cae7