94aca6552464ca5d…

Preprint
ID: 5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a12,622 bytesFirst seen Jun 24, 20261 collection

Fields

NameValue
abstractWe argue that experts are more hawkish the closer they are to power, both figuratively and literally, and show this through the first study to use survey methods to inquire into the foreign policy preferences of think tank analysts and fellows (think tank employees, or TTEs) relative to professors who are experts in international relations. We find that TTEs are 0.47 standard deviations more hawkish than professors as calculated based on a standard survey measuring militant internationalism (MI). Controlling for self-described ideology mitigates this effect although it remains statistically significant. Among professors, those who have worked for the federal government are higher on MI, as are TTEs located closer to Capitol Hill. Differing levels of regional expertise generally cannot explain these differences, except perhaps in the case of Iran.
abstractViews1780
approvedDate2019-09-16T17:52:15.575Z
assetFileNameThankTanks.8.19.19.pdf
assetFileSizeBytes7165252
assetMimeTypeapplication/pdf
assetUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1/original/what-do-think-tanks-think-proximity-to-power-and-foreign-policy-preferences.pdf
authorIds["name:richard hanania","name:max abrahms"]
categoryIds["5ce663395846762193c9c424"]
citations0
commentsCount0
communityIdAPSA
competingInterestsDeclarationnull
contentDownloads633
contentTypeWorking Paper
contentTypeId5ce663395846762193c9c430
doi10.33774/apsa-2019-cghmc
doiUrlhttps://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-cghmc
engageUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1
eventIdnull
funders[]
gainedEthicsApprovalnull
hasCompetingInterestsnull
isLatestVersiontrue
keywords["think tanks","elites","international relations","public opinion","foreign policy"]
licenseId5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef23
publishedDate2019-09-16T17:52:15.590Z
statusPUBLISHED
statusDate2019-09-16T17:52:15.590Z
subjectId5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752
submittedDate2019-09-13T20:15:14.506Z
supplementaryFiles[]
thumbnailUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1/mediumThumb/what-do-think-tanks-think-proximity-to-power-and-foreign-policy-preferences.jpg
titleWhat Do Think Tanks Think? Proximity to Power and Foreign Policy Preferences
version1
vor{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orac031","vorDoi":"10.1093/fpa/orac031"}
webLinks[]

Canonical JSON

{
  "id": "5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1",
  "type": "Preprint",
  "data": {
    "abstract": "We argue that experts are more hawkish the closer they are to power, both figuratively and literally, and show this through the first study to use survey methods to inquire into the foreign policy preferences of think tank analysts and fellows (think tank employees, or TTEs) relative to professors who are experts in international relations. We find that TTEs are 0.47 standard deviations more hawkish than professors as calculated based on a standard survey measuring militant internationalism (MI). Controlling for self-described ideology mitigates this effect although it remains statistically significant. Among professors, those who have worked for the federal government are higher on MI, as are TTEs located closer to Capitol Hill. Differing levels of regional expertise generally cannot explain these differences, except perhaps in the case of Iran. ",
    "abstractViews": 1780,
    "approvedDate": "2019-09-16T17:52:15.575Z",
    "assetFileName": "ThankTanks.8.19.19.pdf",
    "assetFileSizeBytes": 7165252,
    "assetMimeType": "application/pdf",
    "assetUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1/original/what-do-think-tanks-think-proximity-to-power-and-foreign-policy-preferences.pdf",
    "authorIds": [
      "name:richard hanania",
      "name:max abrahms"
    ],
    "categoryIds": [
      "5ce663395846762193c9c424"
    ],
    "citations": 0,
    "commentsCount": 0,
    "communityId": "APSA",
    "competingInterestsDeclaration": null,
    "contentDownloads": 633,
    "contentType": "Working Paper",
    "contentTypeId": "5ce663395846762193c9c430",
    "doi": "10.33774/apsa-2019-cghmc",
    "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-cghmc",
    "engageUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1",
    "eventId": null,
    "funders": [],
    "gainedEthicsApproval": null,
    "hasCompetingInterests": null,
    "isLatestVersion": true,
    "keywords": [
      "think tanks",
      "elites",
      "international relations",
      "public opinion",
      "foreign policy"
    ],
    "licenseId": "5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef23",
    "publishedDate": "2019-09-16T17:52:15.590Z",
    "status": "PUBLISHED",
    "statusDate": "2019-09-16T17:52:15.590Z",
    "subjectId": "5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752",
    "submittedDate": "2019-09-13T20:15:14.506Z",
    "supplementaryFiles": [],
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5d7bf6a993d9fe0012e1a1a1/mediumThumb/what-do-think-tanks-think-proximity-to-power-and-foreign-policy-preferences.jpg",
    "title": "What Do Think Tanks Think? Proximity to Power and Foreign Policy Preferences",
    "version": "1",
    "vor": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orac031",
      "vorDoi": "10.1093/fpa/orac031"
    },
    "webLinks": []
  }
}

Appears in 1 collection

cambridge-up/open-engage1 version · Jun 24, 2026

Full hash:94aca6552464ca5db42d3a7d8d45892008c09e8ff210a784e4d9cd397fbccb12