d711a270121d45c9…

Preprint
ID: 5dc878efa6490200117d2a092,842 bytesFirst seen Jun 24, 20261 collection

Fields

NameValue
abstractPrimary elections in the US reflect the most inclusive nomination process among political parties across democracies. The desire for mass participation in party nominations appears embedded in a widespread populist ideal. It remains unclear, however, the extent to which voters believe that elites should be able to influence the process. Using data from the 2018 CCES we demonstrate that levels of political engagement, perceived ideological distance from the party, and partisanship predict the degree of support for popular selection of party nominees. We find key differences between the parties, with Republicans, particularly conservatives, more strongly opposed to elite influence. Surprisingly, most voters tend to have a pluralistic approach to selecting nominees, allowing for party officials and experts to weigh in on picking the party’s candidates. The findings have implications for how we conceive of political parties and the kinds of nomination reforms that might be embraced by voters.
abstractViews1150
approvedDate2019-11-12T15:21:16.381Z
assetFileNameAPSA_Preprints_Party_Nominations.pdf
assetFileSizeBytes505524
assetMimeTypeapplication/pdf
assetUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09/original/who-should-decide-the-party-s-nominee-understanding-public-attitudes-toward-primary-elections.pdf
authorIds["name:zachary albert","name:raymond la raja"]
categoryIds["5ce663395846762193c9c422"]
citations0
commentsCount0
communityIdAPSA
competingInterestsDeclarationnull
contentDownloads942
contentTypeWorking Paper
contentTypeId5ce663395846762193c9c430
doi10.33774/apsa-2019-6dvc8
doiUrlhttps://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-6dvc8
engageUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09
eventIdnull
funders[]
gainedEthicsApprovalnull
hasCompetingInterestsnull
isLatestVersiontrue
keywords["Party Nominations","Primary Elections","Pluralism","Populism","Elections"]
licenseId5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27
publishedDate2019-11-12T15:21:16.393Z
statusPUBLISHED
statusDate2019-11-12T15:21:16.393Z
subjectId5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752
submittedDate2019-11-10T21:00:14.083Z
supplementaryFiles[]
thumbnailUrlhttps://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09/mediumThumb/who-should-decide-the-party-s-nominee-understanding-public-attitudes-toward-primary-elections.jpg
titleWho Should Decide the Party’s Nominee? Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Primary Elections
version1
vor{"url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820913279","vorDoi":"10.1177/1354068820913279"}
webLinks[]

Canonical JSON

{
  "id": "5dc878efa6490200117d2a09",
  "type": "Preprint",
  "data": {
    "abstract": "Primary elections in the US reflect the most inclusive nomination process among political parties across democracies. The desire for mass participation in party nominations appears embedded in a widespread populist ideal. It remains unclear, however, the extent to which voters believe that elites should be able to influence the process. Using data from the 2018 CCES we demonstrate that levels of political engagement, perceived ideological distance from the party, and partisanship predict the degree of support for popular selection of party nominees. We find key differences between the parties, with Republicans, particularly conservatives, more strongly opposed to elite influence. Surprisingly, most voters tend to have a pluralistic approach to selecting nominees, allowing for party officials and experts to weigh in on picking the party’s candidates. The findings have implications for how we conceive of political parties and the kinds of nomination reforms that might be embraced by voters.",
    "abstractViews": 1150,
    "approvedDate": "2019-11-12T15:21:16.381Z",
    "assetFileName": "APSA_Preprints_Party_Nominations.pdf",
    "assetFileSizeBytes": 505524,
    "assetMimeType": "application/pdf",
    "assetUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09/original/who-should-decide-the-party-s-nominee-understanding-public-attitudes-toward-primary-elections.pdf",
    "authorIds": [
      "name:zachary albert",
      "name:raymond la raja"
    ],
    "categoryIds": [
      "5ce663395846762193c9c422"
    ],
    "citations": 0,
    "commentsCount": 0,
    "communityId": "APSA",
    "competingInterestsDeclaration": null,
    "contentDownloads": 942,
    "contentType": "Working Paper",
    "contentTypeId": "5ce663395846762193c9c430",
    "doi": "10.33774/apsa-2019-6dvc8",
    "doiUrl": "https://doi.org/10.33774/apsa-2019-6dvc8",
    "engageUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/coe/article-details/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09",
    "eventId": null,
    "funders": [],
    "gainedEthicsApproval": null,
    "hasCompetingInterests": null,
    "isLatestVersion": true,
    "keywords": [
      "Party Nominations",
      "Primary Elections",
      "Pluralism",
      "Populism",
      "Elections"
    ],
    "licenseId": "5cc9d9bf7d4e0000ac04ef27",
    "publishedDate": "2019-11-12T15:21:16.393Z",
    "status": "PUBLISHED",
    "statusDate": "2019-11-12T15:21:16.393Z",
    "subjectId": "5e68cb1bd1f19d49ce3ac752",
    "submittedDate": "2019-11-10T21:00:14.083Z",
    "supplementaryFiles": [],
    "thumbnailUrl": "https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/5dc878efa6490200117d2a09/mediumThumb/who-should-decide-the-party-s-nominee-understanding-public-attitudes-toward-primary-elections.jpg",
    "title": "Who Should Decide the Party’s Nominee? Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Primary Elections",
    "version": "1",
    "vor": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820913279",
      "vorDoi": "10.1177/1354068820913279"
    },
    "webLinks": []
  }
}

Appears in 1 collection

cambridge-up/open-engage1 version · Jun 24, 2026

Full hash:d711a270121d45c94698e5fa7c19d1f3fd318d241025211d62cea507af2e8c31