Register source file with the SourceDocument record
131 records1 file151 KiB total9 types
| id | title | description | observationBase | sourceDocument | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| urn:uuid:033edd46-00ec-4b2d-9921-99c1bc9245d3 | precuneus-tpj-mpfc-social-decisions | {"content":"Three clusters — precuneus (d=0.79), left temporoparietal junction (TPJ; d=0.59), and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC; d=0.54) — show greater BOLD response when participants decide for themselves and their partner (Social condition) than for themselves alone (Solo condition), replicating the association of these regions with social decision-making.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:1f154108-1ed9-4084-935a-6ef65adc2418 | social-prpe-weight-positive | {"content":"The weight on partner reward prediction errors resulting from participant choices (social_pRPE) is significantly greater than zero in both the Responsibility model (Study 1: Z=2.85, p=0.004; Study 2: Z=3.26, p=0.001) and the Responsibility Redux model (Study 1: Z=2.93, p=0.003; Study 2: Z=3.30, p=0.001), demonstrating that participant-caused partner RPEs independently influence participant happiness.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:4585605a-6c71-4fd1-ab45-3ef5d2f449c8 | ventral-striatum-tracks-risky-choices | {"content":"Bilateral ventral striatum shows greater BOLD response when participants choose the risky (lottery) rather than safe option, irrespective of Social or Solo condition (left cluster: Cohen's d=0.72; right cluster: d=0.85), replicating established striatal responses to risky decision-making.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:49d08c4f-7b31-4967-9ab7-06aa50a006b4 | lottery-choice-increases-with-ev | {"content":"Probability of lottery selection increases with expected value advantage in both Study 1 (t(4796)=9.26, p<3.1e-20, β=0.074, 95%CI [0.059-0.090]) and Study 2 (t(3829)=10.62, p<5.3e-26, β=0.093, 95%CI [0.075-0.110]), confirming participants were sensitive to expected value in their choices.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:50303ec9-0d79-48a5-ac00-e3386900731b | insula-tracks-guilt-effect | {"content":"Anterior insula BOLD activity is significantly elevated in the Social condition compared to the Partner condition specifically after negative partner outcomes, tracking the guilt effect (responsibility-contingent partner unhappiness).","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:5198582f-237b-447c-810e-c9a4559f9cb6 | solo-vs-social-choice-difference | {"content":"Participants chose lotteries more often in the Solo condition than in the Social condition in Study 1 (t(4796)=2.54, p=0.011, β=0.164, 95%CI=[0.038, 0.291]) but not in Study 2 (t(3829)=0.23, p=0.82, β=0.015), suggesting a weak and inconsistent effect of social context on risk-taking that does not replicate across studies.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:5650c9b0-92e0-42da-8772-aa8523bfbd6b | risk-premiums-null-social-solo | {"content":"Risk premiums do not differ between Solo and Social conditions in either study (Study 1: t(39)=1.53, p=0.134, Cohen's d=0.24, BF10=0.49; Study 2: t(43)=−0.21, p=0.84, d=−0.03, BF10=0.17), providing evidence against social-context-driven changes in risk aversion in this paradigm.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:69cad10c-46f3-4f7e-8cec-3c9de1c629de | responsibility-modulates-guilt-computational | {"content":"A computational model incorporating responsibility-modulated happiness better accounts for the behavioral guilt effect than models without responsibility weighting, providing formal parameterization of the social decision-making component.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:8edb5949-b433-496e-8d9f-1f10df952ddc | agency-reduces-happiness | {"content":"Being the decision-maker (Social + Solo vs Partner condition) reduces participant happiness independently of outcome (Study 1: t(3600)=−3.92, p<0.0001, β=−0.14, 95%CI=[−0.20, −0.07]; Study 2: t(2870)=−6.07, p<0.0001, β=−0.24, 95%CI=[−0.31, −0.16]), consistent with a psychological cost of assuming responsibility for others.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:8f7f9f33-a142-4962-b4cd-f161de239f2e | insula-ifg-connectivity-guilt | {"content":"Functional connectivity (gPPI) between anterior insula and inferior frontal gyrus varies by experimental condition, with increased coupling in the Social condition associated with the guilt effect.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:a26a42bf-23a3-4c8c-a8da-981b1b317381 | guilt-signature-no-individual-difference | {"content":"Individual dot-product values between participants' guilt-related BOLD responses and the Yu & Koban neural guilt signature do not correlate with individual behavioral guilt effect scores (Spearman's Rho=−0.058, p=0.725), indicating the neural signature does not track individual differences in guilt sensitivity as measured behaviorally.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:af22eed8-ee48-4772-9294-94abc7fb74cc | guilt-effect-independent-of-own-outcome | {"content":"The guilt effect (happiness decrease after low partner outcomes under participant vs partner choice) is present regardless of whether the participant received the high or low lottery outcome: high own outcome: Study 1 t(39)=−3.58, p<0.001, d=0.56, BF10=32; Study 2 t(43)=−2.68, p=0.01, d=0.40, BF10=3.8; low own outcome: Study 1 t(39)=−3.39, p=0.002, d=0.54, BF10=19; Study 2 t(43)=−3.58, p<0.001, d=0.54, BF10=33.5.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:b47187b8-9269-495c-90ec-d3b4e4193031 | guilt-reduces-happiness-after-partner-loss | {"content":"Happiness ratings decrease more after negative partner outcomes when the participant made the choice (Social condition) than when the partner made the choice (Partner condition), operationalizing interpersonal guilt as responsibility-contingent unhappiness about partner harm.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:ce86ffb9-f29e-4374-b2d3-9c2c78927ba7 | ventral-striatum-tracks-computational-reward | {"content":"Bilateral ventral striatum activation increases with the computational model's expected certain rewards and expected values of chosen lotteries (left: pFWE=0.002, T=5.63, d=0.75, Z=5.41, 110 voxels, MNI [−14 8 −8]; right: pFWE=0.005, T=5.46, d=0.70, Z=5.26, 80 voxels, MNI [10 10 −4]), validating the model-based fMRI approach as a manipulation check before the STS analysis.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:e0633fdd-645b-4fa1-ae43-8d6b6b170000 | sts-tracks-partner-reward-prediction-errors | {"content":"Superior temporal sulcus (STS) BOLD activity tracks partner reward prediction errors specifically when the participant was responsible for the choice, consistent with mentalizing about the partner's experiential state.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 | |
| urn:uuid:e36646f0-ce3f-4223-acec-a4c490b38400 | happiness-correlates-partner-reward | {"content":"Participant momentary happiness correlates with both participant reward (Study 1: F(1,3598)=691.5, R²=0.16; Study 2: F(1,2630)=650.8, R²=0.20) and partner reward (Study 1: F(1,2426)=128.6, R²=0.05; Study 2: F(1,1735)=111.8, R²=0.06), confirming that participants were emotionally responsive to partner outcomes throughout the task.","format":"text/plain"} | https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds005588 | https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105391 |