{"content":"Is it the case that superior temporal sulcus (STS) — a core mentalizing-network region — represents the partner's affective experience specifically when the participant is responsible for the partner's outcome?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that participants did not engage with the lottery task in a value-sensitive way — choices were inattentive or random — so the behavioural measures carry no information about preference or affect?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that the happiness and choice differences between Social and Partner conditions reflect a social-context-driven shift in risk attitude — participants become more or less risk averse when choosing on another person's behalf — rather than responsibility-contingent interpersonal guilt?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that anterior insula is the neural substrate of interpersonal guilt: when a participant bears responsibility for a choice that yields a negative outcome for another person, anterior insula activity tracks the resulting responsibility-contingent affect?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that the happiness cost observed in the Social condition is general agency aversion — the unpleasantness of being the decision-maker as such — and is not contingent on responsibility for a negative outcome befalling the partner?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that momentary happiness in social decision contexts is governed by a computational rule in which partner reward prediction errors that arise from the participant's own choices (social_pRPEs) carry an independent, non-zero weight, distinct from the weight on partner RPEs that arise without participant agency?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that the imaging pipeline and condition contrasts do not recover established effects, so differences reported between Social and Partner conditions cannot be attributed to the experimental manipulation?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that the happiness decrease following negative partner outcomes under participant choice is driven by the participant's own lottery outcome rather than by the partner's, and so reflects self-directed disappointment rather than interpersonal guilt?","format":"text/plain"}
{"content":"Is it the case that the model-based fMRI approach does not recover known neural signals, so parametric modulators derived from the computational model — including the partner reward prediction error regressors — cannot be trusted?","format":"text/plain"}